JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 27, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Milton Jose Pereira Blanco

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, debido a que los actores no la corrigieron en los términos establecidos en la providencia de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena comparte los criterios del magistrado sustanciador y decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el auto del 1o de julio de 2016, proferido por el Magistrado Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo en el proceso D-11427, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Milton Jose Pereira Blanco e Iliana Carolina Vanegas Fortich, contra el articulo 5o -parcial- de la Ley 1333 de 200911, "[p]or la cual se establece el procedimiento sancionatorio ambiental y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.